Abstract:
The focus in climate change policy has centred on reducing
greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation, manufacturing
and transport, because this is fundamental to any solution to
climate change.
The science now tells us that it will be next to impossible for nations
to achieve the scale of reductions required in sufficient time to avoid
dangerous climate change unless we also remove carbon from the
atmosphere and store it in vegetation and soils.
Terrestrial carbon includes carbon stored in forests, woodlands,
swamps, grasslands, farmland, soils, and derivatives of these carbon
stores, including biochar and biofuels.
The power of terrestrial carbon to contribute to the climate change
solution is profound.
At a global scale, a 15% increase in the world’s terrestrial carbon stock
would remove the equivalent of all the carbon pollution emitted
from fossil fuels since the beginning of the industrial revolution.
The multiple public policy benefits for Australia in adopting full
terrestrial carbon offsets are enormous, but there are also significant
risks of an unregulated terrestrial carbon market to other areas of
public policy.
In a report recently commissioned by the Queensland government,
Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Carbon Biosequestration
Opportunities from Rural Land Use, CSIRO estimate that the Australian
landscape has the biophysical potential to store an additional 1,000
million tonnes of CO2e in soils and vegetation for each year of the
next 40 years.
If Australia were to capture just 15% of this biophysical capacity,
it would offset the equivalent of 25% of Australia’s current annual
greenhouse emissions for the next 40 years.
This represents a gross investment potential of terrestrial carbon
in Australia of between $3.0 billion and $6.5 billion per annum.
It is good news for Australia. It lowers the economic cost of
achieving Australia’s emissions reductions, and makes it possible
for Australia and the world to adopt deeper emission cuts.
If Australia commits to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions
by 25% by 2020, and carbon forestry offsets are included, ABARE
estimate that the majority of these forests will be permanent
environmental plantings rather than harvested plantations.
If we plan wisely, terrestrial carbon presents an economic
opportunity of unparalleled scale to address a range of other great
environmental challenges confronting Australia: repairing degraded
landscapes, restoring river corridors, improving the condition of our
agricultural soils, and conserving Australia’s biodiversity.
It also poses significant risks. Without complementary land use
controls and water use accounting arrangements in place, there
is a risk that carbon forests will take over large areas of agricultural
land, causing adverse impacts on food and fibre production, and
impacting on regional jobs that are dependent on these industries.
ABARE has estimated that if Australia commits to reducing
greenhouse gas emissions by 25% by 2020, over 40 million hectares
(an area equivalent to 40% of the entire Murray Darling Basin) would
be economically suitable for carbon forestry.
In some locations, newly established carbon forests could also cause
a reduction in runoff into rivers and worsen existing over-allocation
problems.
The challenge for Australia is to optimise this new terrestrial carbon
economy to drive investments towards improving the health of our
agricultural soils, protecting areas of high conservation significance
and repairing degraded landscapes, and away from damaging native
vegetation and prime agricultural land.
It is also counterproductive to create economic incentives to
revegetate overcleared landscapes without introducing
complementary measures to reduce broadscale land clearing.
Clearing of native vegetation still contributes 13% of Australia’s
greenhouse gas emissions.
Australia needs to plan where we want trees, where we produce food
and where we might do both.
It is the role of Australia’s governments (Commonwealth, State,
Territory and Local) to build the institutional structures to create
these opportunities and manage these risks by:
1. Designing a Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme that captures
the full potential of terrestrial carbon in vegetation and soils,
providing land managers across Australia the opportunity
to optimise their contribution to the climate change solution;
2. Regulating the terrestrial carbon market so that multiple
economic and environmental benefits can be realised, whilst
avoiding unintended consequences for fresh water resources,
biodiversity and agricultural land;
3. Assisting communities prepare regional Climate Change
Adaptation Plans to manage the impacts of climate change on
the Australian landscape and guide the development of policies
to optimise future investments in terrestrial carbon;
4. Underwriting climate change adaptation policies and terrestrial
carbon investments by building a system of regionally based,
National Environmental Accounts, to monitor the health and
change in the condition of our natural resource assets;
5. Establishing a Climate Change Adaptation Fund, by applying a
1% levy on the sale of emission permits to monitor, plan and
invest in actions to minimise the impact of climate change on
Australia’s biodiversity, coasts, and land and water resources; and
6. Strengthening international efforts to protect and restore
terrestrial carbon in tropical forest landscapes that will promote
new international rules to provide the opportunity for developing
countries to capture this potential.
These reforms will mean that a price on carbon stored in the
landscape can make a substantial contribution to Australia’s efforts
to combat climate change.
They can also help Australia adapt as climate change imposes its
footprint across the Australian landscape, and they can be a catalyst
for driving a new generation of economic reforms to improve the
health of our farmlands and the protection and restoration
of Australia’s biodiversity.