<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Ciencia e Investigación</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11606/1</link>
<description>Publicaciones científicas sobre investigaciones hechas en el Área de Conservación Guanacaste</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 10:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-06-03T10:40:29Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Improving the statistical reporting of hatching success data: the case of sea turtles</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2494</link>
<description>Improving the statistical reporting of hatching success data: the case of sea turtles
Santidrián Tomillo, Pilar; Martínez-Abraín, Alejandro; Valverde, Verónica; Spotila, James R.; Paladino, Frank V.
Estimating hatching success of egg clutches is essential for quantifying reproductive success in sea turtles. Thus, proper reporting is necessary to provide meaningful information for knowledge acquisition and management. Here we review how hatching success has been reported in the scientific literature and use our own multi-annual multi-species datasets to explore the best ways for describing hatching success data. Despite non normality, the central tendency of hatching success data was most often described using arithmetic means. Only 17 out of 203 (8%) studies reported the median, compared to 192 (95%) that reported the mean (6 studies reported both). In 24% of studies, a dispersion metric was not provided. In our comparison, the arithmetic mean was only a good predictor of central tendency in leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), with the median (0.45) being only slightly above the mean (0.43). In leatherbacks, hatching success was characterized by high variability, and not by a consistently low hatching success, as indicated by the low skewness and large spread of data. On the contrary, hatching success data were strongly skewed and skewed toward high values in green turtles (Chelonia mydas) (25% and 75% percentiles: 0.88 and 0.98) and olive ridley turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) (25% and 75% percentiles: 0.75 and 0.97) respectively, with presence of outliers in both cases. Basic statistics, appropriate for characterizing non-normal distributions such as the median, skewness or kurtosis, together with boxplots, provided accurate description of hatching success data. Using these straightforward statistics would greatly improve the ecological understanding of hatching success in sea turtles.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2494</guid>
<dc:date>2025-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Zero‐shot shark tracking and biometrics from aerial imagery</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2493</link>
<description>Zero‐shot shark tracking and biometrics from aerial imagery
Lalgudi, Chinmay K.; Leone, Mark E.; Clark, Jaden V.; Madrigal‐Mora, Sergio; Espinoza, Mario
he recent widespread adoption of drones for studying marine animals provides
opportunities for deriving biological information from aerial imagery. The large
scale of imagery data acquired from drones is well suited for machine learning
(ML) analysis. Development of ML models for analysing marine animal aerial im-
agery has followed the classical paradigm of training, testing and deploying a new
model for each dataset, requiring significant time, human effort and ML expertise.
2. We introduce Frame-­ Level Alignment and Tracking (FLAIR), which leverages
the video understanding of Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2) and the vision-language
capabilities of Contrastive Language-­ Image Pre-­ training (CLIP). FLAIR
takes a drone video as input and outputs segmentation masks of the species of
interest across the video. Notably, FLAIR leverages a zero-­ shot approach, elimi-
nating the need for labelled data, training a new model or fine-­ tuning an existing
model to generalize to other species.
3. We trained state-­ of-­ the-­ art object detection and instance segmentation models
on a new dataset of Pacific nurse sharks. We show that FLAIR massively outper-
forms these methods and performs competitively against two human-­ in-­ the-­ loop
approaches for prompting SAM 2, achieving a Dice score of 0.8. FLAIR readily
generalizes to other shark species without additional human effort and can be
combined with custom heuristics to automatically extract relevant information
including length and tailbeat frequency.
4. FLAIR has significant potential to accelerate aerial imagery analyses, requir-
ing markedly less human effort and expertise than traditional machine learning
workflows, while achieving superior accuracy and generalization performance.
By reducing the effort required for aerial imagery analysis, FLAIR allows scien-
tists to spend more time interpreting results and deriving insights about marine
ecosystems.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2493</guid>
<dc:date>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mass stranding of Pelagic Seasnakes, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Hydrophis platurus&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; (Squamata: Hydrophiidae),in Guanacaste, Costa Rica</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2492</link>
<description>Mass stranding of Pelagic Seasnakes, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Hydrophis platurus&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; (Squamata: Hydrophiidae),in Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Solórzano, Alejandro; Sasa, Mahmood
</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2492</guid>
<dc:date>2025-01-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Coral reefs restoration initiatives in Costa Rica: ten years building hope</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2491</link>
<description>Coral reefs restoration initiatives in Costa Rica: ten years building hope
Alvarado, Juan José; Evans, Katharine; Kleypas, Joan A.; Marín-Moraga, José Andrés; Mendez-Venegas, Mauricio; Pérez-Reyes, Carlos; Sandoval, Marylaura; Solano, María José; Villalobos-Cubero, Tatiana
Introduction: Costa Rica has been recognized worldwide for its high biodiversity and the conservation actions
it has implemented. One of the most iconic ecosystems are coral reefs, which have experienced strong anthropo-
genic and natural pressures in recent years. To ensure these ecosystems’ preservation and services, a series of coral
restoration initiatives have emerged in the last ten years along both Pacific and Caribbean coasts.
Objective: To document the different advances of the various coral restoration initiatives Costa Rica’s Pacific
and Caribbean coasts.
Methods: This review focuses on the implementation of the different reef restoration efforts, indicating the
restoration techniques used, the coral species used in the nurseries, as well as the general results of survival and
growth.
Results: The first coral restoration project in Costa Rica occurred in the 1990s and was the only such effort until
the 2010s. In 2013, a pilot project began in the Golfo Dulce area, which was later replicated in other areas of the
country, such as Manuel Antonio, Sámara, and Bahía Culebra on the Pacific coast, and more recently in Punta
Cahuita in the Caribbean. Various artificial structures have been used as nurseries in the water column such as
trees and ropes, and benthic structures such like A-frames, tables, and spiders, the former being very effective
for branching species (Pocillopora spp.), while the rest have worked successfully both for branched and massive
species (Pavona spp. and Porites spp.). The results shows a growth rates have been between 6 and 9 cm/year, with
survival of 60–90 % of the branching and massive colonies. All sites were seriously affected by the El Niño 2023
phenomenon, with high bleaching values and loss of colonies in the nurseries and on the reef.
Conclusion: Despite geographic and oceanographic distinctions, these projects have emphasized local engage-
ment and perception of coral reefs, fostered intersectoral public-private collaborations for financial and human
resources, and operated within established governmental regulatory frameworks. All projects face vulnerabilities
such as El Niño events and Harmful Algal Blooms.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2491</guid>
<dc:date>2025-03-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
