COPA

Digital Repository for Área de Conservación Guanacaste, a World Heritage Place.

Costs of male infanticide for female capuchins: When does an adaptive male reproductive strategy become costly for females and detrimental to population viability?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fedigan, Linda M.
dc.contributor.author Hogan, Jeremy D.
dc.contributor.author Campos, Fernando A.
dc.contributor.author Kalbitzer, Urs
dc.contributor.author Jack, Katharine M.
dc.date.accessioned 2026-06-01T21:06:40Z
dc.date.available 2026-06-01T21:06:40Z
dc.date.issued 2021-11
dc.identifier.citation Fedigan, L. M. et al. (2021). Costs of male infanticide for female capuchins: When does an adaptive male reproductive strategy become costly for females and detrimental to population viability?. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24354
dc.identifier.issn 0002-9483
dc.identifier.issn 1096-8644
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24354
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11606/2394
dc.description.abstract Objectives: Infanticide in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus imitator) typically occurs in association with alpha male replacements (AMRs). Although infanticide is likely adaptive for males, it imposes costs on females that are difficult to quantify without long-term demographic data. Here we investigate effects of AMRs and infanticide on female reproductive success and how these costs affect capuchin groups. We investigate (1) effects of AMR frequency on the production of surviving infants; (2) energetic and (3) temporal “opportunity costs” of infant loss; and (4) how AMR frequency impacts capuchin group sizesMaterials and methods: We censused six groups (7–33 years/group, 74 adult females). We modeled surviving infant production in relation to AMR. We estimated a female's energy requirements for lost infants and the temporal cost relative to the median reproductive window. We simulated how varying AMR rates would affect future capuchin group sizes. Results: Females exposed to more frequent AMR tended to produce fewer sur- viving offspring. We estimate the average lost infant requires approximately 33% additional energy intake for its mother and represents 10% of the average repro- ductive opportunity window available to females. Simulated populations remain viable at the observed rate of AMR occurrence but decrease in size at even slightly higher rates. Discussion: While infanticide is adaptive for males, for females it affects lifetime reproductive success and imposes energetic and opportunity costs. Although capu- chin populations have evolved with AMRs and infanticide, small increases in AMR frequency may lead to population decline/extinction. Infanticide likely plays a large role in population maintenance for capuchins.
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartof American Journal of Physical Anthropology
dc.subject alpha male replacement
dc.subject Cebus capucinus imitator
dc.subject long-term data
dc.subject population viability analysis
dc.subject survival analysis
dc.title Costs of male infanticide for female capuchins: When does an adaptive male reproductive strategy become costly for females and detrimental to population viability?
dc.type Article


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Colección Pública
    Artículos de Acceso Abierto y Manuscritos de Investigadores entregados a ACG

Show simple item record

Search COPA


Browse

My Account